Error
  • 850-433-1141 | info@talk103fm.com | Text line: 850-790-5300

World News

The migrants on the frontline of Trump’s mass deportation plan

The migrants on the frontline of Trump’s mass deportation plan 150 150 admin

By Kristina Cooke and Ted Hesson

Blanca Figueroa and Severiano Martinez have known from the start of their eight-year marriage that she was at risk of deportation because she entered the United States illegally.

Now – with President-elect Donald Trump expected to issue a flurry of executive orders aimed at speeding the deportation process on the day he takes office on Jan. 20 – that risk has become an overwhelming source of anxiety and discussion in their central Florida home.

Figueroa, who is from Guatemala, and Martinez, who is a U.S. citizen, live with their seven-year-old son who was born in the U.S., and a teenage son from an earlier relationship who has a green card. Figueroa says she is the family’s main breadwinner and Martinez’s caregiver after he was injured at his job on a horse ranch.

“He worries a lot that if they deport me that he would not be able to manage the house and the boys,” she told Reuters.

About a third of the 1.4 million people expected to be prime targets for deportation – those like Figueroa with “final orders of removal” – live in the Florida and Texas enforcement areas, according to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement data obtained by Reuters.

The two states have enacted their own laws cracking down on immigrants in the country illegally. At least another third of migrants living under final orders are in California and other “sanctuary” states that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

Reuters spoke with half a dozen immigrants living in Florida and Texas with removal orders as well as immigration advocates and church leaders, who described rising anxiety and a scramble to meet with lawyers and make contingency plans for children and other dependents in case they are deported. They described their fear of being picked up by police indiscriminately or for driving without a license.

John Budensiek, sheriff in Martin County, Florida – an hour’s drive north from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club – said that many offenders who pass through his jails could be “low-hanging fruit.”

Budensiek, a Republican, said the sheriff’s office has “had a really rough time” getting ICE officers to pick up immigration violators from their jails during President Joe Biden’s presidency.

“I believe that the Trump administration will be pretty aggressive with grabbing them up,” he said.

An ICE spokesperson said the agency considers individual circumstances when determining whether to detain someone.

Figueroa, 36, crossed the U.S.-Mexico border illegally in 2016 and was ordered deported after she missed an immigration court hearing that November. She met Martinez, 64, later that year, when they worked on the same ranch. “He was, and still is, my angel here,” she said.

Despite marrying a U.S. citizen, Figueroa has been unable to legalize her status. She missed the window to appeal her deportation order, and a judge denied her motion to reopen the case, court records show.

None of the options Figueroa and Martinez have discussed in case of her deportation – him staying in Florida with the kids; moving as a family to Mexico – seem remotely workable to them as they depend on Figueroa’s income and on Martinez’s health insurance.

A longtime Republican voter, Martinez stayed home last year because of the rhetoric around immigration. “They try to blame all the people who come to America but the country is built on immigrants,” he said. Even so, he hopes the bombast around mass deportations remains just that. “We have to have faith,” Figueroa said.

‘BIGGEST FEAR’

Tom Homan, who will be border czar in Donald Trump’s incoming administration, has said immigrants with final deportation orders have already had a chance to argue their case in front of a judge.

“At the end of that due process, when they get ordered removed, those orders have to be executed or what the hell are we doing?” he told Reuters in October. “If those final orders don’t mean anything, then shut down immigration court.”

Immigration advocates counter that many people under final deportation orders are long-term residents, law-abiding, contributing economically and have U.S.-citizen children or spouses.

“The majority of undocumented people in this country have been here for over a decade,” said Representative Maxwell Frost, a Democrat whose district includes half of Orlando and surrounding areas. “These are our neighbors. These are people who are working.”

Frost said he plans to meet with Orlando-area mayors, law enforcement, judges and school leaders to encourage them to limit cooperation with the deportation effort.

“We’re not going to let them do this stuff in the shadows,” Frost said. 

Trump’s plan to prioritize deportations of people with final orders of removal is a dramatic shift from Biden’s focus on serious criminals and national security threats.

The Biden administration directed ICE officers to consider certain factors before making an arrest, including whether the person was a long-term resident or primary caregiver.

“Those are the kinds of factors that would be relevant to a law enforcement officer in making a public safety determination,” said Tom Jawetz, a former U.S. Department of Homeland Security official who helped draft the Biden guidance. 

Trump’s new guidance would prioritize criminals but allow anyone without legal status to be picked up, giving more discretion to ICE officers, Reuters reported in November.

Such a shift could put people like Adriana, a Cuban woman with a 2-year-old U.S. citizen son, at greater risk of deportation. She spoke on condition her last name not be used for fear of being targeted for deportation.

Adriana received an expedited deportation order when she crossed the U.S.-Mexico border in 2021, although her husband was given the chance to make his political asylum case in immigration court. His next hearing is in 2027.

Because she could not be immediately deported to Cuba, she has to check in regularly with immigration officials in South Florida, where she now lives. “I don’t know what’s going to happen, I can’t sleep, I can’t eat,” she said. “What if I’m separated from my baby?”

DEPORT TO OTHER COUNTRIES

For Jorge Lopez-Giron, 47, a gay man from Honduras who has been living in the U.S. without legal status since 2000, the anticipated hardline shift under the Trump administration means he could be at an even greater risk of deportation because of a misdemeanor domestic violence conviction.

Lopez-Giron, who works as a rideshare and food delivery driver in Austin, spent three months in ICE detention after he was convicted in 2009 following a bar fight with his then-boyfriend, he said. He was ineligible for asylum because he had spent years in the U.S. without applying.

The Austin-based advocacy group American Gateways helped pause his removal order based on his fear of anti-LGBTQ discrimination in Honduras. The order could be reinstated if he commits another crime, if conditions in Honduras change, or if a third country agrees to take him, said Edna Yang, an attorney with the group.

Lopez-Giron feels a measure of security with his removal case paused, but also knows people with criminal records will be a focus of the Trump administration.

“I’m afraid,” Lopez-Giron said. “What if a police officer arrests me because of the color of my skin or because I don’t speak English well?”

Other migrants – from countries like Cuba and Venezuela that have frosty relations with the U.S. and accept few deportees – were low priorities for deportation under Biden.

Homan, Trump’s choice of border czar, told Reuters he will work to increase deportations to those nations or recruit other countries to accept them.

Alain, a Cuban who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border illegally in 2021, now lives in Houston with his wife Erika, a Honduran who also lacks legal status, and their four children. Their two youngest are U.S. citizens.

Alain, 32, first left his family farm in Cuba’s Matanzas Province in 2019 after he was harassed and detained by police over the business and his opposition to the communist government, he said.

He applied for asylum from Mexico during the first Trump administration and was denied. He then crossed the border illegally. At that time, Cuba was not accepting U.S. deportation flights. Alain was released with an order of supervision and ordered to check in with ICE once a year.

He has been working with American Gateways to contest his deportation order and recently purchased a big-rig truck and trailer to start his own trucking business.

Deportation flights to Cuba resumed in 2023 and the Biden administration has also been deporting some Cubans caught crossing illegally to Mexico.

Alain worries how Erika would support their children if he was deported.

“I had plans to buy a house next year, but I’m afraid,” he said. “It’s a risk to buy a house because if I’m deported, I’ll lose everything.”

(Reporting by Kristina Cooke in San Francisco and Ted Hesson in Washington; Additional reporting by Octavio Jones in Ocala, Florida, and Evan Garcia in Austin, Texas; Editing by Mary Milliken and Suzanne Goldenberg)

source

International reaction to Gaza ceasefire deal

International reaction to Gaza ceasefire deal 150 150 admin

(Reuters) -Negotiators reached a phased ceasefire deal on Wednesday in the war in Gaza between Israel and the militant group Hamas. Here is some reaction to the deal.

U.S. PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN 

“I can announce a ceasefire and a hostage deal has been reached between Israel and Hamas,” Biden said at the White House. 

“Fighting in Gaza will stop, and soon the hostages return home to their families.”

“For the Palestinian people, a credible, credible pathway to a state of their own. And for the region, a future of normalization, integration of Israel and all its Arab neighbors, including Saudi Arabia,” he said.

U.S. PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP

“We have a deal for the hostages in the Middle East. They will be released shortly. Thank you!” he said in a post on his Truth Social platform. 

“With this deal in place, my National Security team, through the efforts of Special Envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, will continue to work closely with Israel and our Allies to make sure Gaza NEVER again becomes a terrorist safe haven,” Trump said in a second post.

U.N. SECRETARY-GENERAL ANTONIO GUTERRES

“The United Nations stands ready to support the implementation of this deal and scale up the delivery of sustained humanitarian relief to the countless Palestinians who continue to suffer,” he told reporters.

“It is imperative that this ceasefire removes the significant security and political obstacles to delivering aid across Gaza so that we can support a major increase in urgent lifesaving humanitarian support.”

TURKISH FOREIGN MINISTER HAKAN FIDAN

He told reporters in Ankara the ceasefire deal was an important step for regional stability. Fidan also said Turkish efforts for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would continue.

QATAR’S PRIME MINISTER SHEIKH MOHAMMED BIN ABDULRAHMAN AL THANI

The prime minister called for calm in the Gaza Strip between now and Jan. 19 when the ceasefire deal takes effect.

EGYPTIAN PRESIDENT ABDEL FATTAH AL-SISI

He welcomed the Gaza ceasefire deal, according to a post on X, and stressed the importance of a fast delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza. 

INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS PRESIDENT MIRJANA SPOLJARIC 

“I hope this agreement marks a new beginning. Civilian lives must be protected and their needs prioritised. The coming days are critical and we are counting on the parties to hold to their commitments. While the agreement is welcome, it is not the end.”

URSULA VON DER LEYEN, PRESIDENT OF EUROPEAN COMMISSION

“I warmly welcome the ceasefire and hostage release agreement in Gaza. Hostages will be reunited with their loved ones and humanitarian aid can reach civilians in Gaza. This brings hope to an entire region, where people have endured immense suffering for far too long. Both parties must fully implement this agreement, as a stepping stone toward lasting stability in the region and a diplomatic resolution of the conflict,” she said.

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES FOREIGN MINISTER SHEIKH ABDULLAH BIN ZAYED

He stressed “the importance that both Israel and Hamas adhere to the commitments made to end the suffering of the Palestinian prisoners and Israeli hostages.”

He said unhindered delivery of humanitarian aid was urgent.

QATARI EMIR SHEIKH TAMIM BIN HAMAD AL THANI

“We hope that the announcement of a ceasefire agreement in Gaza will contribute to ending the aggression, destruction and killing in the strip and the occupied Palestinian territories, and to start a new phase in which this just cause will not be marginalised.”

SAUDI ARABIA’S FOREIGN MINISTRY

It welcomed the deal and thanked the mediating countries. It urged commitment “to the deal to end the Israeli aggression on Gaza and the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from the strip and all Palestinian and Arab lands… It also affirms the importance of building on this deal to resolve the basis of the conflict.”

MOHAMMED ABDULSALAM, SPOKESPERSON FOR YEMEN’S HOUTHIS

“We salute Gaza’s legendary and historic resilience in the face of Israel’s fiercest aggression against the oppressed Palestinian people…. With its continued occupation of Palestine, (Israel) represents a threat to the security and stability of the region.”

SOUTH AFRICA GOVERNMENT

“South Africa welcomes the ceasefire agreement reached between Israel and Hamas after 15 months of Israel’s genocidal onslaught on Gaza after Hamas and other armed groups launched an attack on Israel. South Africa calls for the implementation of a just and lasting peace that ensures the human rights of both Palestinians and Israelis are protected and promoted.”

ALEXANDER DE CROO, BELGIUM’S PRIME MINISTER

“After too many months of conflict, we feel tremendous relief for the hostages, for their families and for the people of Gaza. Let’s hope this ceasefire will put an end to the fighting and mark the beginning of a sustained peace. Belgium stands ready to help.”

GERMAN FOREIGN SECRETARY ANNALENA BAERBOCK

“In these hours there is hope that the hostages will finally be released and the deaths in Gaza will come to an end. Everyone who bears responsibility should now ensure that this opportunity is seized.”

BRITISH PRIME MINISTER KEIR STARMER

“After months of devastating bloodshed and countless lives lost, this is the long-overdue news that the Israeli and Palestinian people have desperately been waiting for,” Starmer said in an emailed statement.

“For the innocent Palestinians whose homes turned into a warzone overnight and the many who have lost their lives, this ceasefire must allow for a huge surge in humanitarian aid, which is so desperately needed to end the suffering in Gaza.

“And then our attention must turn to how we secure a permanently better future for the Israeli and Palestinian people – grounded in a two-state solution that will guarantee security and stability for Israel, alongside a sovereign and viable Palestine state.”

NORWEGIAN PRIME MINISTER JONAS GAHR STOERE

“The Palestinian institutions must be strengthened and prepared to assume full control and responsibility, including in Gaza. Both Israel and Palestine must receive credible security guarantees, and the solution must be anchored regionally.”

SPANISH PRIME MINISTER PEDRO SANCHEZ

“I welcome with hope the ceasefire agreement reached between Israel and Hamas. It must bring an end to the conflict, allow the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza to be addressed and the release of all hostages,” he said on X.

“This agreement is crucial to achieving regional stability. It represents an indispensable step on the road to a two-state solution and a just peace that respects international law.”

ITALY PM GIORGIA MELONI’S OFFICE

“The ceasefire provides an important opportunity to substantially increase humanitarian assistance to the civilian population of Gaza,” it said in a statement.

“Italy is ready to play its part, together with its European and international partners, for the stabilisation and reconstruction of Gaza and to permanently consolidate the cessation of hostilities, also with a view to relaunching a political process towards a just and lasting peace in the Middle East, based on the two-state solution, with Israel and a State of Palestine living side by side in peace and security, within mutually recognised borders.”

(Reporting by Reuters bureaus; Compiled by Alison Williams, Deepa Babington and Cynthia Osterman)

source

Analysis-Biden to hand unfinished agenda to Trump for chaotic Mideast

Analysis-Biden to hand unfinished agenda to Trump for chaotic Mideast 150 150 admin

By Matt Spetalnick

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. President Joe Biden’s national security adviser Jake Sullivan described the Middle East in late September 2023 as “quieter” than it had been in two decades.

That assessment did not age well.

Just eight days later, Hamas launched a deadly surprise attack from Gaza into Israel, triggering a war that devastated the Palestinian enclave and spread turmoil across the region – a cascade of crises that has cast a cloud over Biden’s foreign policy legacy as he prepares to leave office on Jan. 20.

Even with Biden aides having played a major role in securing a Gaza ceasefire deal for Hamas’ release of hostages announced on Wednesday, Biden’s Middle East record is likely to be remembered not so much for how conflicts ended on his watch but mainly for how they unfolded, seemingly beyond his ability to contain them, analysts say.

This also means there will be plenty of unfinished business to hand over to once-and-future president Donald Trump and his incoming administration.

Biden’s record on the world stage is likely to be heavily defined by his handling of the 15-month war in Gaza, part of what Trump and his fellow Republicans have seized on as a “world on fire” during the Democratic president’s tenure. They accuse Biden of weak resolve that encouraged foes to foment chaos throughout the region.

Biden’s allies contend that he has had to confront a set of Middle East challenges not of his making and has handled them skillfully, weakening Iran and its regional proxies while working to limit civilian casualties in Gaza and Lebanon.

But Biden’s steadfast support for Israel in a response that decimated Hamas but also killed tens of thousands of civilians in Gaza took a heavy toll on U.S. international credibility. It also divided his Democratic Party, one of many factors in Vice President Kamala Harris’ defeat by Trump in the November election.

“The upside is Biden came to Israel’s defense as a reliable ally,” said Aaron David Miller, a former Middle East adviser to Democratic and Republican administrations. “The downside is he had little success constraining (Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu in Gaza, and that’s done serious reputational damage to the U.S.”

The Gaza ceasefire plan hammered out in the final days of Biden’s term after months of on-off negotiations was based on proposals he announced in mid-2024 and required dogged persistence alongside Qatari and Egyptian mediators to get across the finish line.

But the last-minute diplomatic breakthrough in Doha was widely seen by regional players as more a result of Trump’s warnings that there would be “hell to pay” if the hostages were not released by the time of his inauguration on Monday, a threat likened by a Middle East source close to the Gaza talks to a “sword” hanging over the negotiators.

Trump dispatched his incoming Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, to collaborate with Biden’s chief negotiator, Brett McGurk, and an Israeli official said Witkoff’s presence added momentum to the talks.

“Witkoff was able to pressure Netanyahu into accepting the deal and moving quickly,” an official briefed on the talks said, referring to a meeting with the conservative leader who had forged a close relationship with Trump during his first term.

Netanyahu’s cabinet will vote on the agreement on Thursday, with a majority of ministers expected to approve it, an Israel government official told Reuters.

Though Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Tuesday laid out a proposal for post-war Gaza, it will be up to the Trump administration to ensure full implementation of the ceasefire plan and decide how much of a role to play in the “Day After.”

BIDEN DRAWS CREDIT AND CRITICISM

In his final year in office, Biden has been credited with forging an international coalition that helped shield Israel against Iranian missile attacks and for consenting to Israeli counterstrikes against Tehran’s air defenses – though he had warned against hitting Iranian nuclear and oil sites.

Despite U.S. calls for restraint in Lebanon, Israel last year dealt one blow after another against Hezbollah militants, often with little or no advance notice to Washington. That was seen as the main impetus for the Iran-backed Islamist group’s agreement to a U.S.-backed ceasefire in November.

The Biden administration was then caught off guard by a lightning rebel offensive that toppled Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad, another major Iranian ally, in early December. It has been scrambling since to persuade the new Islamist rulers to form an inclusive government and prevent an Islamic State resurgence, tasks that Trump will now inherit.

“The greatest feat is Biden didn’t get in the way of Israel, but he constantly counseled ‘don’t do this, don’t do that’,” said Elliott Abrams, who was Trump’s special envoy on Iran during his first term and now rates Biden’s Middle East record as “mediocre.”

“I don’t think he deserves much credit in Lebanon or Syria,” he added.

Biden, in his farewell foreign policy speech at the State Department on Monday, defended his approach, insisting that the U.S. contributed significantly to Iran now being “weaker than it’s been in decades.”

Some experts have also commended him for helping avert an all-out regional war.

But Biden still leaves Trump with what most analysts see as his biggest Middle East challenge – an Iranian nuclear program that has advanced over the past four years and could race toward developing a nuclear weapon if it decides to do so.

It was Trump’s decision to abandon the international nuclear deal with Iran in 2018 that critics say opened the way to its nuclear moves, and Blinken on Tuesday counted it as one of Biden’s successes that Tehran has been deterred from obtaining a nuclear bomb.

Once back in office, Trump will have to decide whether to pursue a new nuclear pact with Iran or give Netanyahu the green light to hit Iranian nuclear facilities.

“The decision on how to approach Iran ultimately will drive much of Trump’s decision-making related to the region as a whole,” said Jonathan Panikoff, a former U.S. deputy national intelligence officer on the Middle East.

Trump will also have to respond to another Iran-aligned group, Yemen’s Houthis, who for more than a year have fired missiles at Red Sea shipping and toward Israel. Military action ordered by Biden and coordinated with U.S. allies has failed to end the Houthi threat.

While acknowledging the Middle East remains “rife with risk,” Blinken, in his final policy speech, cited accomplishments he said included helping the U.N. broker a ceasefire in Yemen’s civil war, strengthening the international coalition against Islamic State and deepening regional integration.

SAUDI-ISRAEL NORMALIZATION EFFORT UPENDED

Sullivan was widely mocked by Biden’s critics after the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas rampage for his comments little more than a week earlier that the Middle East “is quieter today than it has been in two decades” – even as he acknowledged continuing challenges.

Though Sullivan later defended his remarks, telling NBC News they were in the context of regional developments in the past few years and the administration had not taken its “eye off the ball,” the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict upended Biden’s global agenda.

Shortly after the attack by Hamas gunmen – who killed 1,200 people in Israel and seized more than 250 hostages – Biden, a self-described “Zionist,” became the first U.S. president to visit the country during wartime.

He then kept up a steady flow of weapons to Israel for its declared effort to destroy Iran-backed Hamas, despite frequent pushback from Netanyahu against U.S. demands to curb civilian casualties and ease the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

Biden’s resistance to using U.S. leverage as Israel’s chief arms supplier alienated many Arab American voters and sent shockwaves through the U.S. diplomatic corps.

“Gaza will be the legacy,” said Mike Casey, a former State Department official with 15 years as a foreign service officer who was among those who resigned in protest. “They’re going to find bodies in rubble. People are going to continue to die from disease … It’s always going to come back to him.”

The White House did not respond to a request for a response to criticism of its Gaza policy.

At the same time, the Gaza war derailed Biden’s efforts to broker landmark normalization between Israel and Saudi Arabia coupled with U.S. security guarantees for the kingdom.

Some Arab governments are now waiting to see whether Trump, who in his first term arranged diplomatic ties between Israel and several Arab states under the Abraham Accords, will revive normalization efforts and also take a tougher stand against Iran.

Within the Trump camp, there is a sense that an Israeli-Saudi deal is still possible, according to a source familiar with the matter.

But even though some Arab allies have had relatively cool relations with Biden, they remain wary of Trump, given his past unwillingness to pressure Netanyahu to agree on a pathway to Palestinian statehood, which has long been a Saudi condition for normalization with Israel.

“Biden hasn’t been seen as the Arab world’s best friend,” said one Middle East diplomat in Washington. “But we still also don’t know exactly what to expect from Trump 2.0.”

(Reporting and writing by Matt Spetalnick; Additional reporting by Humeyra Pamuk, Steve Holland, Gram Slattery, Erin Banco, Nidal al-Mughrabi, James Mackenzie and Maayan Lubell; Editing by Don Durfee and Daniel Wallis)

source

Moldova’s separatist enclave hopes Russia will resume gas supplies soon

Moldova’s separatist enclave hopes Russia will resume gas supplies soon 150 150 admin

By Alexander Tanas

CHISINAU (Reuters) -Moldova’s breakaway Transdniestria region expects to receive Russian gas again soon to meet its needs, its leader Vadim Krasnoselsky said on Wednesday, two weeks into crippling power cuts in the Russian-backed enclave.

The prime minister of Moldova’s pro-European central government said Russia was intent on bringing to power a Moscow-friendly government in the country. He said Moscow would probably provide volumes of gas too small to ensure electricity supplies to both rebel and government-held areas.

Tens of thousands of people in Transdniestria have been without gas or winter heating since Jan. 1, when Russia’s Gazprom suspended gas exports to the region, citing an unpaid Moldovan debt of $709 million that Chisinau does not recognise as valid.

Moscow blames the suspension of gas supplies on pro-Western Moldova and Ukraine, which refused to extend a five-year gas transit deal that expired on Dec. 31 on the grounds that the proceeds help fund Russia’s invasion.

“I hope that as a result of these negotiations (in Moscow), in the near future gas will be supplied to Transdniestria for electricity generation and to our citizens,” Krasnoselsky told a news briefing in Tiraspol, the main city in the rebel area.

“The gas will be supplied as humanitarian gas in the volume necessary for the population of Transdniestria, for heat and power generation and for industrial enterprises of Transdniestria,” he added.

Russia has not yet commented on the issue.

Krasnoselsky said there would be further negotiations to determine the start date for deliveries and their route.

Transdniestria, a tiny pro-Russian and mainly Russian-speaking separatist region along the Dniester River and the border with Ukraine, received about 2 billion cubic meters of Russian gas a year via Ukraine, using the fuel to heat homes and generate electricity, which it sold to the rest of Moldova.

‘GAMES AND TRICKS’

Moldova’s authorities have said that despite a valid contract and the option of an alternative transit route, Gazprom is refusing to supply gas in order to destabilise its government ahead of this year’s parliamentary elections.

The government has sourced alternative supplies from Europe and has offered to help Transdniestria buy gas, but the offer was rejected by the separatist leaders there, who blame Moldova for the crisis.

“The Kremlin regime has held the people there hostage, mercilessly, in the cold and darkness, because it wants to bring to power (in Moldova) pro-Russian groups that will plunge our country into conflict and destabilize public order,” Moldova Prime Minister Dorin Recean told reporters in Chisinau.

Recean said it was clear volumes of gas would be insufficient to generate power for government-controlled areas of Moldova “and will push us towards a conflict.

“That is what the Kremlin wants. Chisinau will not accept these games and tricks.”

Recean said his government was taking legal advice on bringing under Moldovan control the Moldovagaz state gas company, which is 50% owned by Gazprom, and a thermal plant in Transdniestria which generates power for both parts of the country.

He described both as “assets that were seized by Russia”.

(Reporting by Alexander Tanas; Writing by Pavel Polityuk, Philippa Fletcher and Ron Popeski; Editing by Bill Berkrot)

source

UN says priority must be easing Gaza suffering, warns security poses aid challenge

UN says priority must be easing Gaza suffering, warns security poses aid challenge 150 150 admin

By Michelle Nichols

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) -United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said on Wednesday the priority now “must be to ease the tremendous suffering” caused by the war in Gaza between Israel and Palestinian militants Hamas, after a ceasefire deal was agreed.

During the 15-month war, Israel has laid to waste much of Gaza and the pre-war population of 2.3 million people has been displaced multiple times. Guterres described the humanitarian situation in the Palestinian enclave as “catastrophic.”

“The United Nations stands ready to support the implementation of this deal and scale up the delivery of sustained humanitarian relief to the countless Palestinians who continue to suffer,” he told reporters.

“It is imperative that this ceasefire removes the significant security and political obstacles to delivering aid across Gaza so that we can support a major increase in urgent lifesaving humanitarian support,” Guterres said.

The United Nations has long described its humanitarian operation as opportunistic – facing problems with Israel’s military operation, access restrictions by Israel into and throughout Gaza and more recently looting by armed gangs.

Critical details of the aid surge are still to be worked out, according to a source familiar with the issue, and were due to be discussed in talks in Cairo on Thursday involving the U.N., aid groups, governments and others.

The source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said security within Gaza would be the most difficult issue.

“Security is not (the responsibility of) the humanitarians. And it’s a very chaotic environment. The risk is that with a vacuum it gets even more chaotic,” a senior U.N. official, also speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters. “Short of any arrangement, it will be very difficult to surge deliveries in the short term.”

‘WE WILL DO WHATEVER IS HUMANLY POSSIBLE’

The deal requires 600 truckloads of aid to be allowed into Gaza every day of the initial six-week ceasefire, including 50 carrying fuel. Half of the 600 aid trucks would be delivered to Gaza’s north, where experts have warned famine is imminent.

“We will do whatever is humanly possible, aware of the serious challenges and constraints that we will be facing. We expect our efforts to be matched by other humanitarian actors, the private sector and bilateral initiatives,” Guterres said.

For more than a year, the U.N. has warned that famine looms over Gaza. Israel says there is no aid shortage – citing more than a million tons of deliveries. It accuses Hamas of stealing aid, which Hamas denies, instead blaming Israel for shortages.

Former U.N. aid chief Martin Griffiths, who stepped down at the end of June, said he was concerned “the stark chaos of Gaza and the criminalization … is going to impede aid even more.”

“What worries me about this, as a humanitarian, is that I don’t want us to be the fall guys of this deal. We should not be used as an alibi for a failure upon which we weren’t even consulted,” Griffiths told media network Al Jazeera.

The United Nations said in June it was Israel’s responsibility – as the occupying power in the Gaza Strip – to restore public order and safety in the Palestinian territory so aid can be delivered.

Hamas came to power in Gaza in 2006 after Israeli soldiers and settlers withdrew in 2005, but the enclave is still deemed as Israeli-occupied territory by the United Nations. Israel controls access to Gaza.

The current war was triggered on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas killed 1,200 people in southern Israel, and took some 250 hostages, according to Israeli tallies. Since then, more than 46,000 Palestinians have been killed, according to Gaza health ministry figures.

(Reporting by Michelle Nichols and Jonathan Landay; Editing by Jasper Ward and Rod Nickel)

source

US says Trump administration will be obliged to continue probe of Israeli actions in Gaza

US says Trump administration will be obliged to continue probe of Israeli actions in Gaza 150 150 admin

By Daphne Psaledakis and Kanishka Singh

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. State Department’s obligation to continue probing some Israeli actions in the Gaza War will pass to the incoming administration of Republican President-elect Donald Trump, a department spokesperson told reporters on Wednesday.

WHY IT’S IMPORTANT

Democratic U.S. President Joe Biden will leave office on Jan. 20 and hand over to Trump. U.S. State Department officials have identified hundreds of potential incidents of civilian harm during Israel’s military operations in Gaza involving U.S.-furnished weapons, but have not taken further action on them, sources told Reuters in late October.

Washington has maintained military and diplomatic support for its ally despite criticism from human rights groups stemming from over 46,000 killings in Israel’s war in Gaza, according to the local health ministry. The Israeli military onslaught has also led to accusations of genocide and war crimes that Israel denies.

KEY QUOTES

“We continue to work to reach definitive answers with respect to a number of the incidents that we are looking at,” the State Department spokesperson said when asked about Israeli actions being looked into by the U.S. government.

“But I can tell you that the obligation that the State Department has to investigate potential violations of international humanitarian law through the use of U.S. weapons are not obligations that expire on Jan. 20th. They are obligations that carry over from this administration into the next administration.”

CONTEXT

Negotiators reached a phased deal between Israel and Palestinian Hamas militants on Wednesday to end the Gaza war that has displaced the entire population of the Palestinian enclave and caused a hunger crisis.

The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked Israel, killing 1,200 and taking about 250 hostages, according to Israeli tallies.

(Reporting by Daphne Psaledakis and Kanishka Singh in Washington; Editing by Leslie Adler and Matthew Lewis)

source

Israel hostage families on roller coaster of hope and despair as Gaza deal reached

Israel hostage families on roller coaster of hope and despair as Gaza deal reached 150 150 admin

By Rami Amichay

TEL AVIV (Reuters) – Families of Israeli hostages held in Gaza gathered on Wednesday in the Tel Aviv square where they have held rallies for more than a year, as news trickled out of the agreement struck with Hamas to halt the fighting in Gaza and bring the hostages home.

After more than 15 months in Hamas captivity, the first of an initial group of 33 hostages is expected to be returned to Israel on Sunday before negotiations on the release of the remaining 65 begin around two weeks later.

The first group, made up of children, women, men over 50 as well as the wounded and sick, will be released gradually over the coming six weeks, but it was still unclear who on the list is alive and who is dead.

Bring Them Home, a group representing hostage families, issued a statement expressing “overwhelming joy and relief” at the agreement but for many, the primary feeling was one of exhaustion and doubt as they waited to learn the fate of their loved ones.

“It’s a roller coaster,” said Yosi Shnaider, a cousin of Shiri Bibas who was taken with her husband Yarden and children Ariel and Kfir, who were 4 years and 10 months old during the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.

“We don’t know if they’re on the list, if they’re going to come back in the first phase, if they’re alive, if not. We actually don’t know anything. It’s scary,” he said.

The fact that the hostages would be returned in small groups over many weeks, leaving families waiting, left a shadow over the hope that their relatives could be back with them.

“The families cannot stand it anymore,” he said. “I have no words to describe how difficult it is.”

The Bibas family are among the highest profile hostages still held in Gaza. Ariel and Kfir are the only children left after an earlier deal in November 2023 that returned more than 100 of the 251 people Israel says were seized in the attack by Hamas fighters who killed some 1,200 soldiers and civilians on the deadliest day in Israel’s history.

Video showing Hamas gunmen abducting Yarden Bibas on Oct 7 was broadcast on Israeli media last year and the fate of the family has gripped Israeli and world attention as the war in Gaza has raged around them.

‘THIS IS HELL’

The deal which may bring an end to the war came after months of on-and-off negotiations and heavy pressure from the administrations of U.S. President Joe Biden and of incoming President Donald Trump, who promised “hell to pay” if the hostages were not returned.

Israel’s campaign in Gaza has killed more than 46,000 Palestinian fighters and civilians, Palestinian officials say, and devastated the coastal enclave, creating a humanitarian crisis for more than 2 million people trapped in the rubble.

Hamas gave its agreement on Wednesday, and the Israeli cabinet is expected to back it on Thursday. Foreign Minister Gideon Saar cut short a European visit to attend a security cabinet vote.

“This is the right move. This is an important move,” Israeli President Isaac Herzog said in a statement. “There is no greater moral, human, Jewish or Israeli obligation than to bring our sons and daughters back to us.”

Surveys show that most Israelis support a deal to get back the 98 Israeli and foreign hostages still in Gaza and end a war that has left Israel increasingly isolated internationally and taken an increasing toll on the military.

“I think that that’s amazing, we’ve been waiting so long for our hostages to finally come home, praying, hoping, and now it’s finally happening. And we’re so excited,” said 18 year-old Ariella Cohen as she sat with friends in a Jerusalem cafe.

But the deal has also aroused strong opposition from hardline nationalist members of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government as well as from some of the hostage families themselves.

Hardliners say it will undermine Israeli security in the longer term, while relatives of male hostages, including both serving soldiers and men of military age, fear they may never be returned given the complications of negotiating with Hamas, which remains in Gaza despite losing thousands of fighters and most of its top leaders.

“This is not an agreement, this is just hell,” said Daniel Algarat, whose brother Itzhak Elgarat, 69, was abducted from Nir Oz kibbutz on Oct. 7.

“Trump promised us hell and we are in hell,” he said. “The government doesn’t have a mandate to bring just part of them, they need to bring all of them back.”

“My brother is going to come in the first stage but we don’t know what his condition is, we don’t know if he is alive, we know nothing.”

(Writing by James Mackenzie; Editing by Howard Goller)

source

India’s navy launches submarine, warships to guard against China’s presence in Indian Ocean

India’s navy launches submarine, warships to guard against China’s presence in Indian Ocean 150 150 admin

MUMBAI, India (AP) — India’s navy on Wednesday simultaneously launched a submarine, a destroyer and a frigate built at a state-run shipyard, underscoring the importance of protecting the Indian Ocean region through which 95% of the country’s trade moves amid a strong Chinese presence.

Defense Minister Rajnath Singh said that the Atlantic Ocean’s importance has shifted to the Indian Ocean region, which is becoming a center of international power rivalry.

“India is giving the biggest importance to making its navy powerful to protect its interests,” he said.

“The commissioning of three major naval combatants marks a significant leap forward in realizing India’s vision of becoming a global leader in defense manufacturing and maritime security,” Prime Minister Narendra Modi said while commissioning the vessels at the state-run Mazagon dockyard in Mumbai.

The situation in the Indian Ocean region is challenging with the Chinese navy, India’s main rival, growing exponentially, said Rahul Bedi, a defense analyst.

Bedi said that the INS Vagsheer submarine, the sixth among a French license-built Kalvari (Scorpene)-class conventional diesel-electric submarines, is aimed at replacing aging Indian underwater platforms and plugging serious capability gaps in existing ones. India now has a total of 16 submarines.

The P75 Scorpene submarine project represents India’s growing expertise in submarine construction in collaboration with the Naval Group of France, Bedi said.

India’s defense ministry is expected to conclude a deal for three additional Scorpene submarines to be built in India during Modi’s likely visit to Paris next month to attend the Artificial Intelligence Action Summit hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron.

However, the first of these boats, according to the Indian navy, is only likely to be commissioned by 2031.

India commissioned its first home-built aircraft carrier in 2022 to counter regional rival China’s much more extensive and growing fleet and expand its indigenous shipbuilding capabilities.

The INS Vikrant, whose name is a Sanskrit word for “powerful” or “courageous,” is India’s second operational aircraft carrier. It joins the Soviet-era INS Vikramaditya, which India purchased from Russia in 2004 to defend the Indian Ocean and Bay of Bengal.

___

Ashok Sharma reported from New Delhi.

source

A look at the events that led up to the detention of South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol

A look at the events that led up to the detention of South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol 150 150 admin

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol was detained on Wednesday after a massive law enforcement operation at the presidential compound that ended a weeks-long stand-off between his bodyguards and the country’s anti-corruption agency. He is wanted for questioning about his Dec. 3 decision to impose martial law on the country.

The National Assembly voided his short-lived declaration just hours after it was announced.

At the time, Yoon claimed he took the action because the liberal opposition, which has a legislative majority, was obstructing his agendas and even the approval of his budget. He described the opposition as North Korea-sympathizing, “anti-state forces” responsible for “wreaking havoc and are the main culprits of our nation’s downfall.”

Here is a timeline of events:

Anti-corruption investigators and police raid the presidential compound and detain Yoon, more than six weeks after his ill-fated power grab. Yoon, the first sitting president to be apprehended, had been holed up in the Hannam-dong residence in the capital, Seoul, for weeks while vowing to “fight to the end” the efforts to oust him.

The Constitutional Court held its first formal hearing in the case. The session lasted less than five minutes because Yoon refused to attend. The next hearing is set for Jan. 16.

The chief of the presidential security service, Park Jong-joon, resigns.

Scuffles occur on Jan. 3 when dozens of investigators were stopped from entering Yoon’s compound by presidential security forces, military personnel and vehicle barricades.

Seoul Western District Court issues a warrant to detain Yoon for questioning.

The National Assembly votes to impeach South Korea’s acting President Han Duck-soo over his unwillingness to fill vacancies on the bench of the Constitutional Court, plunging the country into further political turmoil.

The National Assembly passes the motion 204-85, impeachingYoon. His presidential powers and duties are subsequently suspended and Prime Minister Han, the country’s No. 2 official, takes over presidential powers.

Yoon defends his martial law decree as an act of governance and denies rebellion charges, vowing to “fight to the end” in the face of attempts to impeach him.

The National Assembly passes motions to impeach national police chief Cho Ji Ho and Justice Minister Park Sung Jae, suspending them from official duties, over their alleged roles in the enforcement of martial law.

Kim Yong Hyun, the former defense minister, is formally arrested over his alleged collusion with Yoon and others in imposing martial law. The Justice Ministry says Kim was stopped from attempting suicide hours before a Seoul court issued his arrest warrant.

South Korean police send officers to search Yoon’s office to look for evidence related to the martial law introduction but they are blocked by Yoon’s security team from entering the compound.

Police detain the national police chief and the top officer for Seoul over their roles in enforcing Yoon’s martial law orders.

Kwak Jong-keun, commander of the Army Special Warfare Command whose troops were sent to parliament after Yoon declared martial law, tells lawmakers that he received direct instructions from former defense minister, Kim, to obstruct them from entering the National Assembly’s main chamber. He says Kim’s instructions were to prevent the 300-member Assembly from gathering the 150 votes necessary to overturn Yoon’s martial law order.

Kwak says Yoon later called him directly and asked for the troops to “quickly destroy the door and drag out the lawmakers who are inside.” Kwak says he did not carry out Yoon’s orders.

South Korea’s Justice Ministry bans Yoon from traveling overseas as police, prosecutors and South Korea’s anti-corruption agency expand competing investigations into allegations of rebellion and other charges in connection with his martial law decree.

Prosecutors detain former defense minister, Kim, over his alleged role in planning and executing Yoon’s martial law enforcement.

Yoon apologizes and says he won’t shirk legal or political responsibility for declaring martial law. He also says he would leave it to his party to chart a course through the country’s political turmoil, “including matters related to my term in office.”

Yoon survives an impeachment vote that most ruling party lawmakers boycotted, denying the motion that required a two-thirds majority.

In a bombshell reversal, Han Dong-hun, reformist leader of Yoon’s party, expresses support for suspending Yoon’s constitutional powers, saying that the president poses a “significant risk of extreme actions, like reattempting to impose martial law, which could potentially put the Republic of Korea and its citizens in great danger.”

Yoon replaces his Defense Minister Kim, a close associate believed to be the person who recommended the president declare martial law. Han, the leader of Yoon’s party, says he would work to defeat the opposition-led impeachment motion — even though he criticized Yoon’s declaration as “unconstitutional.” Han says there’s a need to “prevent damage to citizens and supporters caused by unprepared chaos.”

Shortly after midnight, National Assembly Speaker Woo Won Shik says through his YouTube channel that the Assembly will respond to Yoon’s martial law declaration with “constitutional procedure.”

Woo reaches the Assembly’s main chamber around 12:35 a.m. Some South Korean troops break windows to enter the Assembly but fail to reach the main chamber. Woo opens a meeting at 12:47 a.m. to hold a vote on whether to lift martial law.

At around 1 a.m., 190 lawmakers, including 18 from Yoon’s own conservative People Power Party, voted unanimously to lift martial law. Troops and police begin to retreat from the Assembly shortly later.

At 4:30 a.m., martial law is formally lifted following a Cabinet meeting.

In a surprise announcement at 10:29 p.m., President Yoon tells a national television audience he’s declaring martial law, saying the opposition-controlled National Assembly has become a “den of criminals” paralyzing government affairs.

Yoon vows to “eradicate” his political rivals, describing them as North Korea-sympathizing, “anti-state forces” responsible for “wreaking havoc and are the main culprits of our nation’s downfall.” He doesn’t back his claims with direct evidence.

In reaction, the main opposition Democratic Party calls for an emergency meeting.

As lawmakers begin rushing to the National Assembly, the military’s martial law command issues a proclamation declaring sweeping government powers, including the suspension of political parties’ activities and other political gatherings that could cause “social confusion” and control over media and publications. It says anyone who violates the decree could be arrested without a warrant.

Hundreds of heavily armed troops encircle the Assembly, apparently to prevent lawmakers from gathering to vote on the martial law declaration. Democratic Party leader Lee Jae-myung live-streams his journey from a car, pleading for people to converge on the parliament to help lawmakers get inside. The shaky footage shows him climbing over a fence to reach the grounds.

Associated Press writer Patrick Quinn in Bangkok contributed to this report.

source

Russian airstrike targets infrastructure in western Ukraine

Russian airstrike targets infrastructure in western Ukraine 150 150 admin

(Reuters) – Russia pounded critical infrastructure facilities in western Ukraine, authorities said on Wednesday, in the latest airstrike on the latter’s hobbled energy grid as it approaches mid-winter.

The governor of Ukraine’s western Lviv region said two facilities, in the Drohobych and Stryi districts, were damaged in the attack.

In neighbouring Ivano-Frankivsk, the governor said local air defences were fending off Russian attacks on facilities there.

Both said no injuries had been reported but did not provide any other details.

Earlier on Wednesday, Ukraine’s national grid operator introduced emergency power cuts in six regions amid warnings from Kyiv’s air force of missiles launched by Russia during a nationwide air-raid alert.

Separately, Ukrainian energy minister German Galushchenko said on social media that “preventative measures” involving the distribution system were also in force.

Russia has carried out regular air strikes on Ukraine’s energy grid as its ground forces press ahead on the battlefield in the Kremlin’s three-year-old invasion.

(Reporting by Dan Peleschuk; Editing by Bernadette Baum)

source